You could say 'past-oriented fiction' or 'period fiction'. They both kind of mean the same thing as historical fiction.
One popular alternative historical fiction is 'The Man in the High Castle' by Philip K. Dick. It presents an alternate world where the Axis powers won World War II. Another is 'Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell' which reimagines a magical England during the Napoleonic Wars. 'Fatherland' by Robert Harris is also well - known, set in a world where Hitler won the war.
You could call it a 'technical narrative' or a 'technical story'.
Well, you could say 'novelettes' or 'brief tales'.
Well, you could say 'comic book' or 'illustrated story'.
Sure. There's a risk of cherry - picking historical elements. Authors might choose only the parts of history that fit their fictional narrative, ignoring other important aspects. This can give a very lopsided view of a historical period, highlighting some things while completely leaving out others that were equally or more significant in the overall historical context.
The key elements often include accurate historical settings. For example, a historical fiction set in the Victorian era should depict the social norms, architecture, and clothing of that time accurately. Another element is the use of historical events as a backdrop or plot device. Characters in historical fiction are also important; they can be real historical figures or fictional ones interacting with the historical context.
The main difference between alternative historical fiction and traditional historical fiction lies in their approach to history. Traditional historical fiction aims to represent historical events and periods as accurately as possible. It might include fictional characters, but the historical backdrop remains true to the facts. In contrast, alternative historical fiction takes a 'what - if' approach. It imagines a different outcome to a historical event. For instance, a traditional historical novel about the Roman Empire would focus on real battles, emperors, and social structures. However, an alternative historical fiction could imagine what would have happened if Rome had never fallen. This allows for more creative freedom and often leads to very different stories that make readers question the course of history.
In a way, yes. Alternative history books are often considered a subset of historical fiction. They take real historical events and then explore 'what if' scenarios, creating fictional narratives based on those alterations. This makes them a part of the larger world of historical fiction with their own specific appeal.
The setting. It takes place in a specific time in history, the 1930s. This time period had its own social and racial issues which are central to the story.
One well - known alternative universe in fiction is the Mirror Universe in 'Star Trek'. It's a dark and twisted version of the regular 'Star Trek' universe, where the characters' values and behaviors are often inverted. For example, the Federation is an evil and oppressive regime in the Mirror Universe.