It's entirely fictional. The author created the story from imagination, not from real-life events. Though it may touch on universal themes and emotions, it has no direct connection to actual happenings.
It's not a true story. 'The Dog of Flanders' is a work of fiction that uses elements of imagination and storytelling to captivate readers, rather than being rooted in actual facts.
Well, that's tricky. It could go either way. Maybe the author was influenced by a true story or maybe they just used their imagination to create the dog's story.
No, it's not. 'Dog' is usually a fictional story created by the author's imagination.
It's hard to say for sure. Sometimes stories like 'Dog' draw inspiration from real-life events but might be fictionalized to a certain extent.
I don't think so. Stories like 'Dog' often come from the creativity of the author rather than being drawn from real-life incidents. It's more about crafting an engaging tale for the readers.
No, it's not based on a true story. It's likely a fictional creation by the author's imagination.
No. It's a fictional horror story created for the Internet. There's no evidence of any real - life events related to it.
Definitely not. The Smile Dog story is part of the internet horror genre known as creepypasta. It's a completely fabricated tale meant to evoke fear. There's no evidence or indication that it's based on an actual incident. It's just a product of people's creativity in creating spooky stories for the online community.
The answer varies. If the true event being told focuses on a dog and includes its death, then yes. But if the dog isn't a central part or its fate isn't relevant, it might not die.
Moll Flanders was not based on a true story. It's a fictional work created by the author.