The status of the Batman prequel novel as canon is unclear. It could be if it complies with the core lore and is sanctioned by the relevant authorities. But if it contradicts or strays too far from the established Batman narrative, it's likely not canon.
Whether prequel novelizations are canon can vary. It often depends on factors like the author's intent, the publisher's stance, and how well they align with the main story's continuity. Some might be seen as supplementary but not strictly canon.
It depends. Different Batman novels might have different statuses regarding canonicity. Some might be directly tied to the main continuity, while others could be standalone or in alternate universes.
The Batman comics considered canon usually include those directly written by key comic book authors and officially recognized by DC Comics. But it can vary depending on specific storylines and reboots.
The determination of which Batman comics are canon can be a bit complex. Generally, those published under the main DC continuity and officially recognized by DC Comics are considered canon.
Yes, Batman: The Knight comic is typically regarded as canon within the Batman comic universe.
Yes, they are. The Batman Beyond comics are usually regarded as canon within the Batman Beyond universe.
The determination of whether the novel 'Dio' is canon can be complex. It might involve factors like consistency with established lore, authorial intent, and the response from the fan community. Without specific details, it's hard to give a definite answer.
The Ahsoka novel is indeed canon. It fits within the established framework and narrative of the Star Wars universe and contributes to the overall lore.
Yes, the Ahsoka novel is canon. It contributes to the expanded universe and storyline within the Star Wars franchise.
Yes, the Kenobi novel is canon. It's part of the official Star Wars expanded universe.