What do netizens think of Dune 2?
Netizens had mixed reviews of Dune 2. Some netizens gave the film a high degree of recognition and love, praising the visual effects, action scenes, and actors 'performances. Among them, Douban scored 8.3 points, and more than 40% of the audience gave a 4-star rating, showing the audience's high recognition of the film. Film critic Scott Mendelson thought Dune 2 was a visual victory, with stunning visual effects and action scenes. In addition, Director Dennis Villeneuve's directing skills were also praised. He used a unique perspective and superb skills to interpret the sci-fi theme. However, there were also some netizens who had negative comments about the movie. They felt that there was a cultural barrier in the movie, and that it valued the image and the plot was weak. Overall, the netizens had mixed reviews of Dune 2.
What do you think of the Korean netizens 'evaluation of Wandering Earth?
Korean netizens 'comments on the Wandering Earth were mainly focused on the special effects and storyline of the movie. Some people thought that the visual effects of the film were excellent, especially in the scene depicting the Earth leaving the solar system, which showed grand visual effects and scientific rigor. Others were dissatisfied with the storyline and the development of the characters. They felt that the movie's storyline was a little dull and the relationship between the characters was not deep enough. From the comments of Korean netizens, Wandering Earth had achieved a certain degree of success in terms of visual effects and storyline, but at the same time, there were some shortcomings. This kind of evaluation reflected the views and preferences of different audiences towards a movie. Some people might prefer a movie that portrayed the characters and plot in depth, while others paid more attention to visual effects and grand scenes.
Do you think Dune is worth reading? Why?
" Dune " was a fantasy novel series written by William gibson, which mainly told the adventure story in the world of dunes. The series was known for its complex worldview, rich character creation, and excellent plot design. It was considered one of the representative works of fantasy novels. If you want to read a fantasy novel with an outstanding plot and worldview, then the Dune series is definitely worth reading. The series covered stories of many races and occupations, involving magic, war, exploration, politics and many other fields, showing a huge world of sand dunes. In addition, the series also created many distinctive and charming characters so that readers could understand their inner world in depth. The Dune series was also praised for its complex plots and thrilling battle scenes. The readers could experience all kinds of thrilling adventures in the story and feel the emotional entanglements and conflicts of interest between the characters. Therefore, if you are interested in fantasy novels and want to read a fantasy novel with an outstanding plot and worldview, the Dune series is definitely worth reading.
What do you think of the comments of many netizens that the TV series is terrible?
The quality of web novels adapted into television dramas varied. Some television dramas were indeed of poor quality, but there were also some television dramas that were adapted better and received the recognition of the audience. The audience's opinions on the TV series could vary from person to person. Some people might think that the quality of the TV series was not bad, while others might not. However, we can't deny the efforts of the producers and directors of the TV series. They also tried their best to restore the plot and characters in the novel. Therefore, we can't easily deny that the whole work should be viewed objectively.
What do you think about the Korean netizens accusing 'Ruyi Fangfei' of plagiarism?
As a fan of online literature, I don't judge the value of literary works. However, according to the information I know, the situation of being accused of plagiarism does exist. plagiarism refers to the plagiarist using another person's work, idea, or content and treating it as his own original work. This kind of behavior not only violated the rights of the original author, but it could also cause copyright problems for other works. Therefore, the creation and distribution of any literary works should follow the principles of creativity and copyright protection. Of course, just because literary works were inspired by other works or cultural phenomena did not mean that they were plagiarized. However, using someone else's work, creativity, or content and treating it as your own is plagiarism. Whether it was literary works or other works of art, they should respect the principles of creativity and copyright protection to avoid plagiarism.
Guo Jingming of the Age Youth League is the cutest height difference. What do netizens think of this?
Guo Jingming's height became a hot topic among the netizens, and they all had different comments about it. Some people thought that Guo Jingming's height was amazing, but his talent and personality also made him popular with many people. Others thought that Guo Jingming's height was not only embarrassing but also affected the overall image and visual effect, so they were dissatisfied with Guo Jingming's height difference. In general, the netizens had different opinions on Guo Jingming's height difference.
The netizens complained about the broadcast of Cross Fire. What do you think is worth watching?
" Cross Fire " was a youth competitive drama produced by Tengxun. It was released on October 21, 2020. The drama used the game as the background to tell the story of a group of e-sports players growing up on the competitive path. Although the show received high expectations and praise from some viewers during its premiere, there were also some viewers who criticized the storyline and character performance of the show. As a youth competitive drama, it had a certain audience, but it might be misleading and misunderstood by e-sports enthusiasts. Therefore, the audience needed to have a certain degree of rational analysis and judgment when watching the play. As a self-made drama, Cross Fire had certain limitations in terms of production level and actor performance. It required the audience to appreciate it and at the same time, have a certain degree of tolerance and understanding. Although some viewers have criticized the play, we should look at things with a rational attitude and not easily carry out excessive criticism and resistance.
The netizens said that they felt good watching " A Daughter-in-law." What do you think of this drama?
" A Daughter-in-law " was a novel about a wealthy daughter-in-law who entered the family as the protagonist. It was about the rise and struggle of a wealthy daughter-in-law within the family, as well as the competition and conflicts between him and other families. This novel had rich character settings, twists and turns in the plot, and the plot was exciting. Therefore, it was deeply loved by some readers. From an entertainment point of view, the production level of this TV series was relatively high, and the actors 'performances were also very good. The plot and character descriptions were also more in line with the characteristics of the original work, so it was welcomed by a portion of the audience. Of course, everyone had different preferences and evaluation standards for TV dramas, so some people might think that it was not perfect enough. " Duty-in-law " is a very popular novel and TV series. If you like this kind of theme and character setting, you can go and watch this TV series. However, the audience also needed to watch it in moderation to avoid affecting their physical and mental health.
The netizens complained about " Little Storm: Rose of Time." What do you think of this drama?
As a fan of online literature, I don't give any value judgments or emotional evaluations about TV series or movies. But I can tell you some information about " Little Storm: The Time of Rose." This drama will premiere in 2021, and it will be directed by John Woo and starred by Li Qin, Zhang Zhilin, Zhong Jiaxin, and others. The play told a story that traveled through time and space, interweaving history and the future. The production of this drama took many years. Director Woo personally selected the actors and carefully designed and polished the plot and scenes. However, after the premiere, the show was criticized and questioned by some viewers, who felt that the plot was a little dragged, the pace was slow, and there were some shortcomings such as historical facts. Everyone's opinion of a TV series was subjective, and because the audience of a TV series was very wide and different, the audience's evaluation of the TV series would also be different. In any case, we can expect more excellent TV series to bring a better viewing experience to the audience.
Some netizens said that it was understandable for a woman in Guilin to urinate in the corridor. What do you think?
As a fan of online literature, I can't comment on specific moral and ethical issues. However, in general, it was everyone's freedom to defecate in public, but they should abide by the local public order and regulations. Peeing in public corridors may cause inconvenience and trouble to others, and may also lead to the spread of bacteria and other harmful substances. Therefore, such behavior may violate local public order and regulations and may cause dissatisfaction and complaints from others. In all circumstances, we should respect the rights and dignity of others and abide by local public order and regulations. If you encounter any problems in public, you should abide by the local public order and regulations and seek appropriate help and support.
Netizens are constantly debating about 'Ode to Shangyang'. What do you think is wrong with this drama?
Ode to Shangyang was a classic online literary work that had caused a lot of controversy. The following are some of the netizens 'opinions on the drama: The plot is too Mary Sue: The plot of this drama was criticized by some netizens as being too Mary Sue and lacking in realism. For example, the protagonist's family background and social status were described too gorgeously and lacked practical basis. 2. There are problems with the character creation: There are also some problems with the character creation of this drama. For example, the protagonist's emotional description was too simple and lacked depth and complexity. At the same time, the other characters 'images were not three-dimensional and lacked depth. 3. Problems with values: There are some problems with the values of this drama. For example, the description of female characters is too superficial and lacks content and depth. At the same time, the description of some social problems lacked a sense of reality. 4. Poor writing: There are also some problems with the writing of this drama, such as the description being too exaggerated and lacking realism. At the same time, some of the characters 'language and descriptions were not beautiful enough, affecting the beauty of the entire work. It should be noted that this was only the opinion of some netizens and did not represent the views of the entire audience. At the same time, as an online literary work, its advantages and disadvantages should be relatively objective and not just determined by the audience's point of view.