What did the sofa-stool in the novel review mean?
A sofa bench was an online term that originated from television drama reviews to describe the interaction between a person lying on one side like a sofa while another person sat quietly beside him. Later, this term was gradually extended to novel reviews to refer to the attitude or emotion of the reviewers towards the novel. In novel reviews, sofa benches were often used to describe the degree of the reviewers 'love for the novel or the degree of the reviewers' recognition of the novel's plot, character description, theme, and so on. If a novel was reviewed as "sofa", it usually meant that the novel was very popular and liked by the reviewers, while "bench" was used to describe the shortcomings of the novel or the critics 'criticism and doubts about the novel. A sofa bench was a humorous and relaxing term used to describe some interesting or interesting plots and opinions in novel reviews.
What did the internet terms "sofa" and "water" mean?
Couch and douche were internet terms commonly used on online forums, social media, and online chat platforms. The sofa referred to the first person to reply, also known as the "sofa guest" or "the first person to like". It was usually those who expressed unique opinions or caused topics in comments or replies. Farming refers to posting a lot of meaningless or worthless content, usually repetitive, meaningless, or low-quality replies or comments. This kind of behavior was often seen as a waste of online resources and was regarded as a "water post" or "water army." Therefore,"couch" and "douche" referred to those who posted inappropriate content in their replies or comments.
What did it mean that the novel did not pass the review?
A novel that was not approved usually meant that the copyright of the novel or the copyright owner did not approve the content of the novel. This could result in the novel being deleted or banned from publication, and the author could face legal consequences. There could be many reasons why a novel did not pass the review. For example, the content of the novel did not meet the requirements of the copyright owner, grammar errors, unreasonable plot, picture or audio problems, etc. If the novel is rejected by the copyright owner, the author may be forced to abandon the novel or need to modify and resubmit the content.
A novel recommendation like "Stool Stool"
What did the novel review mean by changing the genre?
The genre adjustment usually meant that the novel might need to be adjusted according to the relevant regulations and standards to adapt to the needs of different platforms or readers before it was submitted for review. For example, on some platforms, novels might need to be adjusted according to the characteristics of the audience on the platform to meet their tastes and needs. Similarly, readers 'feedback may also have an impact on the genre and style of the novel, requiring the author to make corresponding adjustments. During the adjustment process, the author needed to re-examine his novel and make adjustments based on the feedback and suggestions of the reviewers to make it more in line with the requirements of the platform and readers. Such adjustments might involve deleting, modifying, adding, and so on, which would have a certain impact on the quality and completeness of the novel. It was quite common for a novel review to change the genre. It required the author to carefully consider and prepare before submitting the work in order to better respond to the requirements and feedback of the reviewers.
What did he mean by the need to review the novel?
A novel review usually referred to the process of the original author (or copyright owner) selling the novel's copyright to the new copyright owner. The new copyright owner would need to review the novel to ensure that the novel met their requirements and standards. This review process is usually handled by the new copyright owners, who will modify the novel to meet their specific needs and standards. The purpose of the review was to ensure that the novel's content and style met the requirements and standards of the new copyright owner and that the novel complied with the provisions of the copyright transfer agreement. If the novel needed to be revised, the reviewers would usually review and evaluate the novel to ensure that the content was correct and complete. The review of the novel was an important part of the copyright transfer process to ensure that the novel met the requirements and standards of the new copyright owner, thus ensuring the legitimacy of the novel and the integrity of the copyright rights.
What did the 30,000-word review on the novel reading network mean?
The 30,000-word review of the novel reading website referred to the word count review of the novels on the website to ensure that the length of the novel reached 30,000 words. Normally, the novel reading website would review the word count of a novel submitted by a new user, but if the novel had already been submitted and approved, there was no need to review it again. The 30,000-word review was a stricter review standard because the length of the novel exceeded the expectations of most readers. At the same time, it also needed to consider the operation and traffic of the website. The novels that passed the review could better meet the needs of readers and improve the reading experience of the website. At the same time, it could also increase the number of visitors and revenue of the website.
What did the novel review mean by selling razor blades?
In novel reviews, selling blades is a metaphor used to describe the plot, characters, and theme of a novel that is as sharp, sharp, and profound as a blade. This metaphor was often used to emphasize the depth and complexity of the novel and its impact on the reader's inner world. Selling razor blades could also be a form of ridicule, indicating that the author of the review had keen insight and sharp criticism ability like a razor blade, able to quickly grasp the pain points and problems in the novel and bring profound enlightenment and reflection to the readers. It should be noted that the metaphor of selling blades does not necessarily apply to all novel reviews. It is usually just a symbolic expression with a certain rhetorical effect. At the same time, readers should also be rational and objective when reading novel reviews. They should not over-interpret and exaggerate the figurative meaning.
What did the novel reading website mean by the need for a review?
The review of a novel on the novel reading website usually referred to the author submitting the work to the novel reading website for review. During the process, the author needed to provide relevant information such as the outline of the work, character settings, plot descriptions, etc. so that the editor could review and modify the work. If the work passed the review, it could be published on the novel reading website. However, if the work failed, the author would have to revise it or submit other materials to try to pass the review.
What do the "sofa" and "irrigation" that are often seen in posts mean?
The words "sofa" and "douche" were Internet terms commonly used on social media such as forums and blog posts. " The sofa " referred to the first person to express their views or reply. It could also be understood as the " first person to speak." " Flooding " referred to publishing content of low quality, repetitive, or lengthy content just to fill in the gaps of the previous content. It was often considered a "water post" or "garbage post" that was reported by other users or deleted by the forum administrator. It should be noted that these terms may have slightly different meanings on different social platforms.
What did it mean to have a B-grade novel after the review?
A B-grade novel reviewed by the website of Fragrance in Red Sleeves was a novel that met the review criteria but still needed improvement in some aspects. On the website of Fragrance to the Red Sleeves, the rating system for novels was divided into three grades: A, B, and C. A was the highest rating, B was the second highest rating, and C was the intermediate rating. B-grade novels were those that had been rated as B-grade in the review process. The story, character image, writing style, and other aspects of the novel had been strictly screened and reviewed to meet the website's review standards, but there were still some shortcomings that needed to be improved and improved. The website would constantly update and maintain these novels to improve the quality of the novels and the readers 'reading experience.