The historical status of French novels and short stories, which is higher and which is lower?

Answer 1

French novels and short stories had their own advantages and disadvantages in the history of literature. Long novels were usually more grand and complex, able to show a broader social background and character image, while short novels were more delicate and concise, paying more attention to the plot and character description.

In history, French novels had a higher status than short novels. In the 18th and 19th centuries, the French novel became one of the main forms of European literature. Many famous people, such as Dickens and Tolstoy, wrote novels. These works not only achieved high literary achievements, but also reflected the social reality and people's psychology at that time in terms of ideology and social structure.

However, the short story also played an important role in the history of French literature. In the latter half of the 19th century, the short story gradually replaced the long novel as one of the main forms of French literature. Many famous short stories, such as Hugo and Dickens, were also excellent works. These works not only had a high literary value, but also reflected the various social problems and human weaknesses at that time.

Therefore, the historical status of French novels and short stories had their own advantages and disadvantages. A long novel was more grand and complex, able to show a broader social background and character image, while a short story was more delicate and concise, paying more attention to the plot and character. In different historical periods, they created more colorful and valuable literary works.