Why is Shawshank's original work so different from the movie?

2024-09-19 14:40

1 answer

2024-09-19 16:37

There were many differences between Shawshank's original work and the movie, mainly because of the different production backgrounds and styles. The original novel was written by King and published in 1994. It tells the story of a banker who spent 20 years in Shawshank Prison. The novel was narrated in the first person, depicting a dark, distorted and depressing social reality through the characters and events in the prison. The novel was based on King's personal experience and incorporated his views on the prison system and human nature. It had strong social significance and criticism. In contrast, the movie Shawshank was based on the novel of the same name by the director, Chris Nolan, and was released in 2012. The movie used Nolan's unique narrative and visual style to reinterpret the plot and characters of the novel, adding more special effects and action scenes to present a cold, suspense, and exciting visual effect. At the same time, the movie also paid more attention to the storyline and the development of the characters, emphasizing the power struggle between the protagonist, Keshen, and the prison. The two versions had different backgrounds and styles, which led to great differences in storyline, character creation, narrative, and so on. This was also one of the reasons for the difference in reviews between the original novel and the movie.

Is there a big difference between the original work of Shawshank Redemption and the movie?

1 answer

2024-09-14 07:06

Shawshank's Redemption was very different from the movie. The original novel, The Shawshank Redemption, was a crime novel written by Stephen King. It told the story of a banker who spent 20 years in Shawshank prison and finally obtained freedom through his unyielding efforts and kind nature. The plot of the novel is relatively complicated. Through the story of many characters, it shows the complexity of American prison culture and human nature. It is regarded as a classic in modern literature. The movie, The Shawshank Redemption, was directed by Frank Delabonte and adapted from the novel of the same name. It basically maintained the plot and character image of the novel, but there were some cuts and adjustments in the visual performance and music. The film received widespread praise and was considered one of the greatest films of the 20th century, known for its deep emotions and complexity of the plot, as well as its exploration of humanity, freedom, and hope. Therefore, although the names of movies and novels were the same, their plots, theme, and style were very different.

Why was the final effect of some film and television works so different from the original work?

1 answer

2024-09-22 08:53

There are many reasons why the effect of a film and television work is different from that of the original work. Here are some possible reasons: 1. Inappropriate adaptation: If the adaptation is inappropriate, it may destroy the spirit and artistic conception of the original work, causing the audience to be unable to truly feel the charm of the original work. The adaptation should respect the spirit and artistic conception of the original work, not simply copy and paste it. 2. Financial issues: If the production cost of the film and television works is too high, it may cause the plot and character settings to be different from the original work, thus affecting the final effect. 3. Time and resource constraints: The production of film and television works is limited by time and resources, which may lead to the production quality not being as good as the original work. 4. Audience acceptance: Different audiences have different aesthetic tastes and tastes. If they have a higher acceptance of the original work, they may have different views on the effect of the film and television works. 5. The problem of the creative team: The creative team may have differences in adaptation and creation, resulting in the final effect being different from the original work. There were many reasons why the effect of the film and television works was different from the original works.

Why was the scriptwriter that TVP filmed so different from the original?

1 answer

2024-09-14 02:18

The main reason why the scriptwriter produced by TVP would differ so much from the original drama was that the scriptwriter might make some adjustments and cuts to the original drama to adapt to the needs of the script and shooting conditions. This kind of adaptation and reduction may lead to differences in the plot structure, character setting, plot development, etc., which may cause the audience to feel that it is not consistent with the original drama when watching the scriptwriter. There might also be creative differences in the creative process of the screenwriter. On the basis of the original drama, the scriptwriter might make some new creations or delete the original drama, adapt it, and then recreate it. This new creation might be different from the original drama, causing the audience to feel uncomfortable watching it. In addition, when TVP changed the screenwriter, it might adjust and optimize the character image and plot setting to cater to the audience's taste and market demand, resulting in differences between the screenwriter and the original drama. To sum up, the reason why the scriptwriter and the original drama were so different was mainly because the scriptwriter had adapted and deleted the original drama to a certain extent during the creation process, as well as the creative differences and changes in audience preferences during the creation process.

The Shawshank Redemption book and the movie's content are different

1 answer

2024-09-14 18:23

What you said is correct. The Shawshank Redemption book had some deviation from the movie. In the novel, Andy Dufresne was wrongly accused of murdering his wife and her lover, and he was placed under house arrest for 50 years before being sent to prison. In prison, he met a prisoner named Red, and the two gradually established a friendship and trust. After spending a long and lonely time in prison, Andy finally used his wisdom and patience to successfully escape from prison and start a new life in Mexico. However, in the film adaptation, Andy was portrayed as a prisoner who had been abused and bullied for a long time and was imprisoned for an extended period of time until his death. In addition, there are some differences between the movie and the novel. For example, the character of Warden Red is severely weakened, while Andy's character is portrayed as stronger and more organized. Although the plot in the novel and the movie is different, The Shawshank Redemption is still a novel and movie that is deeply loved by readers and audiences because they portray a strong and unyielding spirit and the best side of human nature.

Why was the TV series " Ordinary World " so different from the original?

1 answer

2024-09-27 02:13

The reason why the TV series Ordinary World was far from the original was as follows: 1. Plot adaptation: The plot and character settings in the original novel have been greatly reduced and adapted to adapt to the length and production requirements of the TV series. For example, many details in the original work, including the dialogue between the characters and their psychological activities, were cut out, resulting in a large difference between the content presented in the TV series and the original work. 2. Character image: The characters in the original work are more full and deep. In order to compress time, the characters in the TV series are simplified and exaggerated, resulting in a big gap from the original work. 3. Setting up of the scene: The original work's description of the scene was more detailed, but the TV series simplified and deleted the scene in order to compress the time, resulting in a big difference from the original work. 4. Changes in values: The values in the original work are more traditional, focusing on emotional factors such as family and love. In order to cater to the taste of the audience, the TV series changed the values and ignored the important values in the original work. Therefore, there were many reasons for the difference between the TV series and the original.

Celebrating the Year is different from the original work

1 answer

2024-10-18 15:01

Yes, the TV series " Celebrating Years " was a little different from the original novel. The TV series was adapted from Maoni's novel of the same name. However, due to the length of the TV series and the limitations of the plot, the screenwriter made some adjustments and cuts to the original novel. Some secondary characters and plots were cut or merged, and some character relationships and plot developments were also adjusted. In addition, some new characters and plots were added to the TV series to enrich the plot and increase the attraction. In general, the TV series " Celebrating the Year " was a re-creation of the original novel. Although it retained the basic framework and theme of the original novel, it was different in details and plot. Not satisfied with watching dramas? Interested in the main character of the main characters, Ye Qingmei? Please click on the link below to see the wonderful content of Ye Qingmei's Diary!

Why was the original content of Godfather 2 different from the movie? Will the original work of Godfather 3 continue the content of the movie? (Fred betrays the family, Kel leaves home

1 answer

2024-09-19 00:47

There were many differences between the original Godfather 2 and the movie version, including: 1. Plot: In the original novel, Fred betrayed his family and left the family. There is no such plot in the movie version. 2. Character development: In the original novel, Kai left his family and went to the United States to pursue his musical dream. However, there was no such plot in the movie version. Kai stayed in Italy and kept in touch with his family. 3. Character relationships: The interpersonal relationships between the family members in the original book are more complicated, including the conflict between Fred and Tom and their relationships with others. The movie version, on the other hand, focused more on the internal struggles of the family. As for whether the original work of Godfather 3 would continue the plot of the movie, the answer was no. The original novel didn't have Fred betraying his family or Kai leaving home, and the plot of Godfather 3 was completely different from the movie version. The main character in the original novel was the godfather, Vito Vigano, who told the story of his life and work in Italy and America, as well as his struggles with his family members.

Why was the original content of Godfather 2 different from the movie? Will the original work of Godfather 3 continue the content of the movie? (Fred betrays the family, Kel leaves home

1 answer

2024-09-19 00:32

The main reason why the content of Godfather 2 was slightly different from the movie version was that the director and screenwriter had made changes and cuts to the novel to suit the needs of the movie production. To be specific, here are some things that might be different from the movie: 1. Character Creation: There is a difference between the Fred Corleone in the novel and the Fred Corleone in the movie. In the novel, Fred was a more mature member of a gangster family. He paid more attention to the family business and the inheritance of cultural values. In the movie, Fred was portrayed as a more selfish and cold character. 2. Plot development: The plot development in the novel is more complicated and detailed than in the movie, including the godfather's past and family history. The movie is relatively simple, mainly laying out the story of the godfather and the family. As for whether the original work of Godfather 3 would continue the content of the movie, the answer was no. The plot of Godfather 3 was based on the novel, and the novel did not describe the plot of Fred betraying his family, so this part of the movie did not appear. The Godfather 3's original novel mainly talked about the Godfather's later years and the series of crises faced by the family, as well as the emotional entanglements and power struggles between the family members.

Why did the movie Tiny Times feel so different from the novel? There's a lot missing from the movie?

1 answer

2024-09-12 19:33

The plot and character settings of the movie Tiny Times and the novel were very different. Because the movie was adapted from the novel, there would be some changes and cuts in certain aspects. In the novel, Tiny Times was a story with Guo Jingming and the others as the main characters, depicting their pursuit of fame, wealth, and love in this flashy world. There were many distinct characters in the novel, such as Yang Mi, Guo Caijie, Guo Biting, etc. Their images left a deep impression on people. In the movie, Tiny Times was adapted into a story with Chen Xuedong, Guo Biting, Yang Mi and others as the main characters. Although there were similar characters in the novel, the movie version was much less portrayed than the novel version. The plot of the movie had also been cut and adapted to make the whole story more compact and attractive. In general, there was a big difference between the movie version and the novel version in terms of plot and character setting, which also made the visual effects and story depth of the movie version and the novel version different.

Why did so many people recommend the movie The Shawshank Redemption?

1 answer

2024-09-08 14:57

The Shawshank Redemption was a film directed by Frank Delabonte, based on Stephen King's novel of the same name. The film is widely regarded as one of the greatest films in history because it is not only an excellent feature film but also a cultural phenomenon that represents the peak of the American film industry. The following are some of the reasons for recommending The Shawshank Redemption: 1. Profound plot: The plot of the movie is very profound and involves topics such as humanity, freedom, and hope. The characters in the movie experienced a lot of difficulties and pain, but they finally obtained freedom and dignity through self-redemption and perseverance. 2. Outstanding actors: The actors in the film were excellent, especially Tim Robins and Morgan Freeman, whose acting skills were widely recognized. Their performances not only made the movie more vivid, but also allowed the audience to understand and feel the emotions in the movie more deeply. 3 Music classics: The music in the movie is very classic. The theme song, Hope is a Dangerous Enemy, composed by Hans Zimmer, is widely regarded as one of the greatest movie music in history. 4. Excellent production: The production of the film is very excellent, including the scene design, photography, sound effects, music and so on. These factors made the visual effects of the movie very good and also made the audience more immersed in the world of the movie. 5. Far-reaching influence: The influence of the film is very large, not only in the United States, but also in the world. This film was not only an excellent film, but also a cultural phenomenon that represented the peak of the American film industry.