Whether science or liberal arts was more important was a complicated question because everyone's point of view might be different. However, you can better understand this problem by referring to the following points and arguments: Modern society needs diverse talents, and science and liberal arts skills are very important. Skills in the science fields, including science, technology, engineering, and mathematics, are very important to the development of modern society. Skills in the liberal arts field, including history, literature, philosophy, and economics, were very important for understanding modern society and culture. Therefore, science and liberal arts were both very important subjects. The development of science and liberal arts is conducive to the progress of mankind. Research in the field of science could promote the development of science and technology, while research in the field of liberal arts could promote the progress of human thought and culture. The interaction and promotion between these two disciplines were indispensable. Different people have different interests and talents. Some people might be more suited to science fields, such as people who like to explore technology and engineering or people who are talented in math and science. Some people might be more suitable for the liberal arts field, such as people who like to explore human thoughts and culture, or people who are talented in history and literature. Therefore, the importance of the subject should be based on personal interest and talent. The development of science and liberal arts is conducive to social innovation and progress. In modern society, innovation and progress were of paramount importance. The study of science and liberal arts would help to promote social development and innovation. Therefore, science and liberal arts were indispensable subjects. Science and liberal arts are both very important subjects. Their development helps to promote human progress and social innovation. Ultimately, the importance of the subject should be based on personal interests and talents, as well as the needs of society.
The liberal arts and science subjects had their own unique values and functions. It was impossible to simply compare the pros and cons. Liberal arts focused on human thoughts, culture, history, language, art, and other aspects, focusing on humane care and emotional expression, while science focused on science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and other aspects, focusing on evidence, logical thinking, and problem solving. Although science may be more technical and professional than liberal arts in some fields, liberal arts also played an irreplaceable role in other fields. For example, the knowledge and experience of liberal arts in the fields of business, management, marketing, etc. could also help companies better understand and respond to market changes and customer needs. Both liberal arts and science required constant learning and exploration to create valuable technologies and products. Therefore, we should respect and play to our respective strengths, constantly explore and learn to create a better future.
There were many majors for liberal arts, such as: History 2 Philosophy 3 Political science 4 Social Studies 5 Economics 6 Psychology 7 Communication 8 Foreign Language and Literature 9 Law 10 Literature Liberal arts students could also choose other majors such as Marxian theory, political education, physical education, educational technology, English education, etc. Different majors have different career prospects and research directions. Arts students can choose a major that suits them according to their interests and advantages.
The majors that were more theoretical in the liberal arts majors included, but were not limited to: 1. Language 2 Philosophy 3 Social Studies 4 Anthropologies 5 Psychology 6 Political science History 8 Economics 9. Marxian Theory 10 Literature These majors placed more emphasis on theoretical research, emphasizing the understanding and mastery of basic concepts, theories, and methods. In these majors, students needed to learn a lot of basic theories and professional knowledge, and they needed to do a lot of reading, writing, and thinking.
Which was more important, the result or the process? This was a common philosophical question that had different perspectives and explanations. The following are some possible information: Maslow's needs theory believes that people pursue results and satisfy high-level needs such as biology, safety, respect, and self-actualization while ignoring low-level needs. So the results might be more important because they're the key to fulfilling human needs. Herzberg's two-factor theory believes that both results and processes can affect people's behavior and decisions, but their importance depends on their social value. In other words, the importance of the results lay in the success and achievements they brought, while the importance of the process lay in the value and meaning they represented. Porter's five-force model believes that enterprises face five competitive factors: suppliers, dealers, dealers, substitutes, and competitors. Among them, suppliers and suppliers usually focus more on results, while retail and substitutes focus more on process. Therefore, the process may be more important because of their impact on the retail and substitutes, as well as their position and competitiveness in the market. Rolf Pareto's theorem states that the most important factors in a system are usually those that occupy the most resources. Therefore, the results may be more important because they represent the main goal and direction of the system. In summary, the outcome and the process depended on different factors and perspectives. Maslow's needs theory, Herzberg's two-factor theory, Porter's five-force model, and Rolf Pareto's theorem all provided different perspectives and explanations.
Bachelor's degree referred to the liberal arts or science subjects chosen in high school. Usually, people would choose a liberal arts or science course in high school and study it in depth at the undergraduate level. However, there were exceptions. Some students would choose to study both liberal arts and science at the same time in high school, or choose an inter-disciplinary direction such as art, economics, management, etc. Such a situation was quite common in high schools.
Liberal arts students could choose many different majors. The specific choice of major depended on their personal interests and career plans. Some common liberal arts majors included language, culture, history, philosophy, psychology, politics, economics, and so on. The more professional liberal arts majors included law, news, education, translation, media, and so on. These professions usually require a strong language, cultural, and legal background, as well as relevant educational or translation skills. If he wanted to cultivate these majors in the humanities field, it might be a better choice. Of course, in addition to the above majors, liberal arts students could also consider other majors such as accounting, human resource management, marketing, and so on. These majors also had a certain degree of practicality and career development space, but they might not have a deep background in the humanities field like the majors mentioned earlier.
As a liberal arts student, reading literary classics was very important to improve his literary attainment and expand his knowledge. Reading literary works can help people understand the changes in human thoughts and behaviors in different cultures and historical backgrounds. It can also cultivate people's reading ability, thinking ability and language expression ability. Literature masterpieces not only have classic value but also provide people with rich imagination, which has a positive impact on creation and writing. Therefore, reading literary classics is very beneficial for liberal arts students. It can help them better understand and appreciate literary works and improve their creative level. Of course, reading literary classics also required a certain amount of time and energy. You need to arrange your reading time and content according to your actual situation and time to avoid over-reading and indulging in literary works.
When choosing between liberal arts or science, one should consider their interests and strengths. If you are interested in history, politics, and social science, and are good at memorizing and understanding abstract concepts, then the liberal arts may be more suitable. If you are interested in physics, chemistry, and engineering, and are good at solving problems and using logical thinking, then choosing science may be more suitable. Of course, this didn't mean that liberal arts and science didn't cross paths. In fact, many disciplines require the understanding and application of historical, political, and social theories. For example, marketing and advertising required a deep understanding of political and economic principles. Therefore, when choosing a subject, you should consider your interests and strengths and try to find opportunities to cross disciplines. The most important thing was that choosing liberal arts or science should prepare for the future career and life. If he chose liberal arts, he might become a historian, political consultant, or social researcher in the future. If he chose science, he might become an engineer, scientist, or programmer in the future. Therefore, they should choose subjects that they are interested in and competent for and be fully prepared for the future.
The choice of liberal arts or science should depend on one's interests and strengths. Liberal arts focused on human thoughts, culture, history, language, and other aspects of knowledge, focusing on interpersonal communication, humanities, and cultural heritage, while science focused on science, technology, engineering, and other aspects of research, focusing on experimental and practical logical thinking and analytical skills. If you are interested in interpersonal communication, humanities, and cultural heritage, and have strong logical thinking and analytical skills, then it may be more suitable to choose liberal arts. If you are interested in science, technology, and engineering, and have strong experimental and practical skills, then it may be more suitable to choose science. Of course, this was only a common situation. In fact, one had to consider personal interests, career plans, future development direction, and other factors to make the most suitable choice for oneself.
There was no definite answer to the question of how many books the liberal arts students had to learn compared to the science students because it depended on the specific subject and the educational arrangements of the university. Different subjects may have different compulsory and elective books, and the number of books may vary. In addition, some subjects may rely more on specific mathematical and scientific concepts than others, and these concepts may not be in the compulsory books of liberal arts or science. However, in general, there were some compulsory books for liberal arts and science subjects, such as Mathematics Analysis and Advanced Algebra for mathematics, Physics for physics and chemistry, and Biology for biology. These books are the foundation of most subjects, so they are usually the books that all students must study. It was important to note that learning mathematics, physics, and chemistry required deep mathematical and scientific knowledge, not just memorizing specific books. Students needed to deepen their understanding and grasp this knowledge through continuous practice and thinking.