The debate competition is about the classics or the popular literature. The questions that can be asked in the free debate segment, I am on the side of the classics, so it is best to be original.As a classic author, I can ask the following questions to support my point of view:
Classic works contain profound thoughts and values that have a profound impact on our growth and development. For example, the social reality and characters described in Dream of the Red Chamber are worthy of our deep consideration and reflection, and the concept of love and marriage in Pride and Predict has a profound revelation for our aesthetic and love. These works not only help us understand the world, but also shape our aesthetics and values.
2. Classic works have extremely high literary and artistic value, leaving precious cultural heritage for future generations. These works not only have a unique charm in language, structure and style, but also reflect the cultural, social and historical background of the time with eternal charm. For example, the plays Hamlet and The White Night Journey by William shakespeare are regarded as the classics in the history of world literature. They not only let us feel the complexity of human emotions and thoughts, but also let us realize the value and significance of literature.
3. Classic works can stimulate our inspiration and creativity. Many classic works were the source of inspiration for authors. For example, Cao Xueqin created a unique literary style through detailed descriptions and imaginative plot designs in Dream of the Red Chamber. Classics can also stimulate our imagination and creativity, making us more determined and confident in the pursuit of our dreams and goals.
To sum up, the classic works have a profound and lasting influence on us. Classic works contain profound thoughts and values that can shape our aesthetics and values. Classic works have extremely high literary and artistic value, which can stimulate our inspiration and creativity. Although popular literature also has a certain effect on us, the effect of classic works is more obvious and lasting.
Questions on the Internet in the Debate CompetitionDuring the debate, there might be questions about whether the advantages of the Internet outweighed the disadvantages or the disadvantages outweighed the advantages. This question depended on the viewpoint and stance of the party debating.
Those who argue that the advantages of the internet outweigh the disadvantages may argue that the internet provides many conveniences and benefits. For example, the internet can make it easier for people to obtain information, communicate and shop, and can also increase productivity and creativity. The Internet could also promote innovation and development, bringing more opportunities and choices to people. In addition, the network could also protect privacy and information security to prevent information leakage and network attacks.
On the contrary, those who argue that the disadvantages of the Internet are greater than the advantages may point out that the Internet also has many problems and dangers. For example, the spread of online rumors and false information will lead to social unrest and panic. Internet addiction and addiction will affect people's mental health and social ability. Internet attacks and security problems will affect the safety and stability of society. In addition, the Internet may also lead to regional discrimination and information imbalance because the information on the Internet is often one-sided and inaccurate.
Therefore, the question of whether the advantages or disadvantages of the network outweighed the advantages or disadvantages in the debate needed to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the network according to the viewpoint and position of the debater, find out the relationship between the advantages and disadvantages, and try to convince the audience and judges through reasonable arguments and logical reasoning.
In the college debate competition, the topic of debate was whether the college students 'major choice should be based on their personal interests or their future. I am the opposing side, seeking freedom to debate the problem,The opposing side's second defense is very grateful for the free debate question you provided. Here are some possible questions for your reference:
Is it necessary to balance personal interests and professional prospects? If you have to make a choice, which factor do you think should be prioritized?
Should personal interests be excluded when choosing a major? If you have to make a choice, which major do you think you should prioritize your personal interests?
3. How to ensure that students don't lose their motivation for majors that have no obvious interest? How to encourage students to pursue their interests while also considering their future employment prospects?
Should students who are interested but have poor job prospects choose this major? If students choose this major, will they succeed?
Should students 'personal background and adaptability be taken into account when choosing a major? If students don't have enough background and adaptability, can they adapt to the new major?
We are going to have a debate. The topic of the debate is our own decision. I am the positive side. I need to ask a few questions to question the negative side. I am urgently asking for thanks.As a positive, you can consider asking the following questions to question the negative:
1 What is "our youth is our own decision"? In this sentence, who should make this decision? What did this decision mean?
If youth needs to make decisions, what should these decisions be like? Does it include immoral or inappropriate decisions?
If a person can't make his own decision, then is there any meaning to his youth?
Are there enough resources for everyone to make their own decisions? If so, where did these resources come from? If not, then why?
Should a person be blamed or punished if he cannot make his own decisions? If so, was this accusation or punishment reasonable?
6. Do those who make their own decisions receive the respect and support they deserve? If so, why? If not, then why?
Is there enough education and social training to help people make the right decisions? If so, where was the training conducted? If not, then why?
If a person's youth is limited or deprived, does he still have the right to pursue his dreams and goals? If so, why? If not, then why?
These questions can help you better understand the opposing side's point of view and arguments in order to better debate.
In the debate competition, I am the affirmative and second debate. The debate topic society should value profit over righteousness. How should I ask the other party questions? I want examples.As the second defender, you can ask the other party the following questions:
Please give an example of why society should value profit over righteousness.
For example, you can ask the other party,"Why should society value profit over righteousness?" Make the other person understand your argument and provide some concrete examples to support it. For example, you might say," Because the interests of society are money and material wealth, and ethics are concerned with people's inner values."
Please explain why it is beneficial to society to value profit over righteousness.
You can ask the other party,"Why is it good for society to value profit over righteousness?" Make the other person understand your argument and provide some concrete examples to support it. For example, you might say," Prioritizing profit over justice makes society more efficient and orderly because people are more focused on business interests than ethics."
Please explain why ethics should not be replaced.
You can ask the other person,"Why shouldn't ethics be replaced?" Make the other person understand your argument and provide some concrete examples to support it. For example, you might say," Morality can help us form the right values, and money and material wealth are only a part of human society. Therefore, ethics are indispensable."
4. Please give an example of how to value profit over righteousness in practice.
You can ask the other party,"Why is it so obvious in practice to value profit over righteousness?" Make the other person understand your argument and provide some concrete examples to support it. For example, you might say," A lot of business activities are based on the principle of profit over justice, such as greedy business giants and illegal monopolies."
I hope these questions will help you better ask the other person and support your argument.
The classic argument of the opposing side in the online pros and cons debate competitionNetwork pros and cons
As a modern communication tool, the Internet provided a convenient and fast way for people to communicate. The benefits of the internet included:
1. The Internet allows us to obtain information more easily. Through the network, we can access all kinds of information resources, including news, articles, videos, etc., anytime and anywhere. Moreover, these contents can be shared on various platforms, making the information more diverse and rich.
The Internet can also help us learn and educate better. Through the internet, we can access various online courses, learning resources, library materials, etc., so that we can have a deeper understanding of various knowledge fields to improve our learning ability and level.
The internet also provides us with more entertainment. Through the internet, we can access all kinds of videos, games, social media, etc. to enrich our entertainment life.
However, there were also some negative effects of the Internet.
The internet could also lead to the spread of false information. Through the internet, we can access all kinds of information, but this information may come from unreliable sources, which will cause us to receive wrong information and affect our judgment and decision-making.
2. The Internet could also lead to the leakage of personal privacy. Through the internet, we can easily access all kinds of sensitive personal information such as home address, phone number, etc., which may lead to the risk of personal information leakage.
The internet could also lead to the spread of violence and hate speech. Through the internet, we can come into contact with all kinds of extreme speech and violence, which may have a negative impact on society.
To sum up, the internet is a tool with both positive and negative effects. We need to use and manage the network correctly to maximize its advantages and avoid its negative effects.
Seeking the Questions of the Third Debate in the Debate Competition (the Internet has more advantages than disadvantages)Whether the advantages of the internet outweighed the disadvantages or the disadvantages outweighed the advantages was a complicated question that could not be answered with a simple "yes" or "no". Here are some possible questions for the debate:
Has the development of network technology improved people's productivity and quality of life?
2. Does network technology facilitate people's lives to a certain extent, such as online shopping, social networking, learning, etc., but it may also lead to personal information leakage, online fraud and other problems?
3. Has network technology brought some new problems to society, such as cyber violence, internet addiction, privacy protection, etc.?
4. What is the development trend of network technology? Will it bring some new harm in the future?
How should we ensure personal privacy and information security in the application of network technology and avoid the negative effects of network technology?
The above questions are to discuss whether the advantages of network technology outweigh the disadvantages or the disadvantages outweigh the advantages, hoping to inspire the debaters to think.
In the debate, I was the opposing side. The college students participating in volunteer activities focused on training. Ask for a debate topic.College students participating in volunteer activities focused on training. On the contrary, it could be argued that college students participating in volunteer activities could not directly train their personal abilities, but might waste time and resources. Here are some possible counterarguments:
1. volunteer activities may affect college students 'studies. If college students participated in volunteer activities too frequently, it might take up their time and cause them to be unable to concentrate on their studies. Moreover, volunteer activities usually required a long time to participate in, which would have a certain negative impact on the health of college students.
2. volunteer activities do not provide practical work experience for college students. Although volunteer activities could cultivate college students 'sense of social responsibility and teamwork, these experiences could not be directly converted into professional experience. For most college students, their main goal was to find a job after graduation. Therefore, volunteer activities were not a necessary step in their career planning.
3. volunteer activities can't improve the academic performance of college students. Although volunteer activities can help students build a good sense of community and social responsibility, they can't directly improve students 'academic performance. Many college students participate in volunteer activities to find a better job after graduation rather than to enrich their studies.
4. The voluntary activities can't improve the professional skills of college students. Although volunteer activities can help students develop their leadership and teamwork skills, they cannot directly improve their professional skills. For many college students, they need to learn professional knowledge in school in order to find a better job after graduation. Therefore, volunteer activities were not a necessary step for them to improve their skills.
I want to participate in the debate competition, the topic is the pros and cons of middle school students using mobile phones, I am the opposite side of the debate, the point of view is that the disadvantages outweigh the advantages, I want to debate the opening argument draftDear judges and audience,
Today, as the opposing party, I would like to explain the pros and cons of middle school students using mobile phones.
As a modern communication technology, mobile phones have not only changed our payment methods and entertainment methods, but also provided many conveniences for students. For example, mobile phones could provide students with learning materials and entertainment resources at any time and anywhere, so that students could learn more efficiently. At the same time, mobile phones could also provide social opportunities for students to expand their horizons and improve their overall quality.
However, there were also some negative effects of using a mobile phone. First of all, using the phone for too long could easily lead to eye fatigue, cervical vertebra disease, and other problems. Middle school students are still in the growth and development period, and their organs are not fully developed yet. Long-term use of mobile phones will have an irreversible impact on their health. Secondly, excessive use of mobile phones would affect the quality of students 'sleep, resulting in poor mental state and affecting their academic performance. Lastly, excessive use of mobile phones could distract students from their studies.
To sum up, there were both pros and cons to the use of mobile phones by middle school students. We should enjoy the convenience of mobile phones while also bearing the negative effects. As a judge, I believe that we should give middle school students a reasonable amount of time to use their phones so that they can use their phones to improve their academic performance and protect their health.