About the ancient brothers and sisters seniority problem, it is not difficult, seek answers

If the same father gave birth to a son with his wife in the first year, then he would have to give birth to a son.
The next year, the first wife gave birth to a daughter.
In the third year, the concubine gave birth to a son.
Then would the son of this concubine be the third young master or the second young master?
(Because there is a daughter in the middle, I don't know how to address her. In ancient times, should the young masters and young mistresses be arranged together or separately? Is there any difference between royalty and commoners?
Ask the expert to answer. Thank you.

Answer 1

In ancient times, the seniority of siblings was usually based on the order of the elders in the family. Generally speaking, the elders in the family had brothers or sisters in order of age. For example, if the elders in the family had an elder brother and an elder sister, then according to this order, the elder brother and elder sister of the family would increase in seniority, and the younger sister would be the lowest.

There were also some ancient families that ranked their seniority according to the age relationship between siblings. For example, if the age difference between siblings was large, then the order of seniority would be based on the order of the elders of the older siblings. In this case, the older siblings would be called "uncle","uncle","middle", and the younger siblings would be called "brother","sister", etc.

No matter how ancient families arranged their seniority, these rules had certain historical and cultural significance, reflecting the social customs and cultural traditions of that time.