It was about the debate. My side: College students should get a job first (Opposite side starts a business). I'm a second defender. Is there any great god who can come up with some routine questions to attack the debate segment?

2024-09-17 01:34

1 answer

2024-09-17 04:04

College students should get a job first (Opposite side starting a business) I am the second debate, you can refer to the following routine questions to attack the debate session: Which is more important, employment or start-up? Why? 2. College students do not have enough experience to start a business. Is employment a better choice? 3 What risks do you need to bear to start a business? And what risks do you have to bear in employment? What are the benefits of starting a business? And what benefits could employment bring? Are there enough resources to support college students to start their own businesses? If so, how did they obtain these resources? What is the difference between employment and starting a business for personal growth? How should college students balance the relationship between the two? What abilities and qualities do you need to start a business? And what abilities and qualities do you need to have for employment? Should college students be encouraged to start their own businesses? If so, how should we formulate relevant policies to support college students 'entrepreneurs? What are the nine cases of failed start-ups? Why? How can we prevent these failures from negatively affecting us? Should I get a job first before starting a business? If so, was this order reasonable? If not, was starting a business suitable for college students? These questions could help develop ideas and allow the opposing side to play better. At the same time, you need to pay attention to the question and answer to fully integrate the topic and argument to let the audience better understand the point of view.

Should middle school students read extra-cursory books to debate the opposite side of the argument

1 answer

2024-09-10 14:27

Honorable judges, dear listeners, today I, as the opposing party, would like to raise a point: middle school students should not read extra-cursory books. First of all, we need to be clear about what extra-cursory books are. Extra-cursory books referred to any books other than textbooks and course materials, including novels, essays, poems, biographies, history, philosophy, and so on. In this information age, we are easily surrounded by all kinds of media and access to a huge amount of information, but we often ignore the power of books. Books can teach us knowledge, inspire us to think, cultivate our imagination and creativity, which are the basic skills we need in modern society. However, for middle school students, reading extra-cursory books might bring some negative effects. First of all, textbooks and course materials were the foundation of their learning. These materials could meet their basic learning needs. If middle school students read too many extra-cursory books, it may distract their attention and affect their academic performance. Secondly, excessive reading of extra-cursory books may lead to the decline of middle school students 'reading ability, affecting their future learning and development. In addition, the content of the extra-cursory books might not be suitable for middle school students to read. Some books involve sensitive topics, violence, sex, and other content. If middle school students read these books, it may have a negative impact on their physical and mental health. Moreover, the content of some books may be too complicated or difficult to understand, which may have a negative impact on the thinking ability of middle school students. Therefore, I think middle school students should focus on studying textbooks and course materials instead of reading extra-cursory books. At the age of students, they should concentrate on learning basic knowledge and cultivate their own thinking ability and creativity, which is the key to future success.

In the debate, I was the opposing side. The college students participating in volunteer activities focused on training. Ask for a debate topic.

1 answer

2024-09-18 06:01

College students participating in volunteer activities focused on training. On the contrary, it could be argued that college students participating in volunteer activities could not directly train their personal abilities, but might waste time and resources. Here are some possible counterarguments: 1. volunteer activities may affect college students 'studies. If college students participated in volunteer activities too frequently, it might take up their time and cause them to be unable to concentrate on their studies. Moreover, volunteer activities usually required a long time to participate in, which would have a certain negative impact on the health of college students. 2. volunteer activities do not provide practical work experience for college students. Although volunteer activities could cultivate college students 'sense of social responsibility and teamwork, these experiences could not be directly converted into professional experience. For most college students, their main goal was to find a job after graduation. Therefore, volunteer activities were not a necessary step in their career planning. 3. volunteer activities can't improve the academic performance of college students. Although volunteer activities can help students build a good sense of community and social responsibility, they can't directly improve students 'academic performance. Many college students participate in volunteer activities to find a better job after graduation rather than to enrich their studies. 4. The voluntary activities can't improve the professional skills of college students. Although volunteer activities can help students develop their leadership and teamwork skills, they cannot directly improve their professional skills. For many college students, they need to learn professional knowledge in school in order to find a better job after graduation. Therefore, volunteer activities were not a necessary step for them to improve their skills.

The debate competition is about the classics or the popular literature. The questions that can be asked in the free debate segment, I am on the side of the classics, so it is best to be original.

1 answer

2024-09-20 10:50

As a classic author, I can ask the following questions to support my point of view: Classic works contain profound thoughts and values that have a profound impact on our growth and development. For example, the social reality and characters described in Dream of the Red Chamber are worthy of our deep consideration and reflection, and the concept of love and marriage in Pride and Predict has a profound revelation for our aesthetic and love. These works not only help us understand the world, but also shape our aesthetics and values. 2. Classic works have extremely high literary and artistic value, leaving precious cultural heritage for future generations. These works not only have a unique charm in language, structure and style, but also reflect the cultural, social and historical background of the time with eternal charm. For example, the plays Hamlet and The White Night Journey by William shakespeare are regarded as the classics in the history of world literature. They not only let us feel the complexity of human emotions and thoughts, but also let us realize the value and significance of literature. 3. Classic works can stimulate our inspiration and creativity. Many classic works were the source of inspiration for authors. For example, Cao Xueqin created a unique literary style through detailed descriptions and imaginative plot designs in Dream of the Red Chamber. Classics can also stimulate our imagination and creativity, making us more determined and confident in the pursuit of our dreams and goals. To sum up, the classic works have a profound and lasting influence on us. Classic works contain profound thoughts and values that can shape our aesthetics and values. Classic works have extremely high literary and artistic value, which can stimulate our inspiration and creativity. Although popular literature also has a certain effect on us, the effect of classic works is more obvious and lasting.

In the college debate competition, the topic of debate was whether the college students 'major choice should be based on their personal interests or their future. I am the opposing side, seeking freedom to debate the problem,

1 answer

2024-09-18 06:04

The opposing side's second defense is very grateful for the free debate question you provided. Here are some possible questions for your reference: Is it necessary to balance personal interests and professional prospects? If you have to make a choice, which factor do you think should be prioritized? Should personal interests be excluded when choosing a major? If you have to make a choice, which major do you think you should prioritize your personal interests? 3. How to ensure that students don't lose their motivation for majors that have no obvious interest? How to encourage students to pursue their interests while also considering their future employment prospects? Should students who are interested but have poor job prospects choose this major? If students choose this major, will they succeed? Should students 'personal background and adaptability be taken into account when choosing a major? If students don't have enough background and adaptability, can they adapt to the new major?

Should primary school students chase after stars (I'm the opposing side in the debate)

1 answer

2024-09-22 05:21

It was a complicated question whether primary school students should chase after celebrities because it involved personal values, family education methods, social environment, and many other aspects. From the point of view of chasing stars, primary school students chasing stars might have some negative effects on their physical and mental health. Chasing idols often required a lot of time and energy to understand their lives, work, and love stories. This could lead to a decline in primary school students 'academic performance, difficulty concentrating, and even affect their daily lives. In addition, some primary school students might have conflicts with their parents because they chased after stars, thinking that they were isolated and did not understand. On the other hand, chasing after celebrities could also be an active lifestyle. Primary school students could improve their artistic and aesthetic standards by paying attention to their idols 'music, movies, and variety shows. It could also help them cultivate good interpersonal relationships and social skills. Chasing stars could also make primary school students feel happy and satisfied because they could feel the common interests and identity between themselves and other fans. In summary, whether primary school students should chase after stars needed to be judged according to the specific situation. If parents allowed and supported primary school students to chase after celebrities, and chasing after celebrities could also bring positive effects, then chasing after celebrities might be acceptable for primary school students. However, if the parents object or do not support the primary school students chasing stars, or if chasing stars has a negative impact on the primary school students 'studies, physical and mental health, then the primary school students should avoid chasing stars.

Regarding the debate on whether high school students should fall in love, I'm on the opposing side.

1 answer

2024-09-13 20:11

On the contrary, high school students shouldn't be in love. Here are some materials that support this view: 1. Falling in love will have a negative impact on learning. High school students were in the middle of learning important knowledge. Falling in love could distract them and cause their academic performance to drop. 2. Love can lead to emotional problems. It was normal for high school students to have emotional problems during puberty. However, if the relationship is unhealthy, it may lead to emotional problems affecting their mental health. 3. Love might affect their future development. High school students should focus on their studies so that they could have a good future. Falling in love might distract them and cause their studies to decline, affecting their future development. Love may affect their image. High school students were educated in school, and their image was also the image of the school. If their relationship was seen by other students, it might affect their image and their status in school. Love may affect their social relationships. High school students should focus on their studies so that they can have a good social relationship in the future. If their relationship was seen by other students, it might affect their social relationships and their future opportunities.

Seeking the three questions of the second debate in the debate competition

1 answer

2024-09-17 01:21

In a debate, the second debate usually requires three questions to support one's point of view. The following are the specific answers to these three questions: Do you think this view is correct? What is the significance of this argument? If this argument is wrong, why is it wrong?

Seeking Opening Remarks for the Opposite Side of the Debate on the Pros and Cons of Biological Mutation

1 answer

2024-09-14 00:50

Honorable judges and audience, I stand here today to raise a point of view on biological mutation. I believe that biological mutation has more disadvantages than advantages, so I don't think it should be encouraged or promoted. First of all, biological mutation could lead to some unknown risks. Mutation itself was not a bad thing, but if the mutation had unpredictable consequences, such as producing abnormally powerful biological weapons or causing certain diseases, it would bring great danger to mankind. Secondly, biological mutation could cause damage to the ecosystem. Some mutated creatures might pose a threat to other species and even destroy the balance of the ecosystem. If such a mutation was used by humans, it could lead to serious consequences. Finally, biological mutation could also lead to some unknown adverse effects. Some mutations might not be beneficial to humans but might cause harm to animals or other living creatures. If such a mutation was discovered and used by humans, it might cause social unrest or ethical controversy. Therefore, I believe that there are more disadvantages than benefits to biological mutation. I hope to hear the different perspectives of the judges and the audience and learn more from them. Thank you!

We want a debate. We're on the opposite side. We don't care about small things. Debate speech, urgent!

1 answer

2024-09-17 01:26

Dear judges and audience, the topic for today's debate is "Don't do small things". We think it's a noble quality not to do small things. We often encounter all kinds of small things in our lives, such as sorting garbage, saving water, respecting others, and so on. These things may seem insignificant, but they are very important to our lives and the development of society. Not doing small things can help us better protect the environment. If everyone could do small things such as sorting garbage and saving water, they could reduce the waste of garbage and water resources and protect the environment. In this way, our earth can serve us better and make us happier and healthier. Not doing small things can help us respect others better. Everyone has their own unique personality and habits. If everyone can not do small things such as not littering, not interrupting others, etc., a good social atmosphere can be formed to promote the harmony of interpersonal relationships. That way, we can respect others better and make our society warmer and better. Not doing small things can also help us develop society better. Society is made up of everyone. If everyone can not do small things, such as not littering, not interrupting others, etc., good social behavior and morality can be formed, and the overall development of society will be more orderly and efficient. To sum up, not doing small things is a noble quality. It can help us better protect the environment, respect others, and develop society. Therefore, we should start with small things and do small things to make our lives and society better. Thank you.

Debate: Should literary works be screened? I'm the opposing side's second defender. I hope everyone can help me check the information and teach me what to say.

1 answer

2024-09-17 01:22

Whether literary works should be screened was a topic worth discussing. Screen adaptation would tamper with, delete, and adapt literary works, making the original pure literary works impure, incomplete, and even lose their original value. At the same time, it would also cause literary works to lose their original spiritual core. Screens could allow more people to understand and appreciate literary works, increasing the popularity and influence of literary works. Through screen-based literary works, it could resonate with more people, allowing more people to understand the author's thoughts and ideas, thus promoting the inheritance and development of literary works. However, screen-based works would also cause a certain degree of damage to literature. Literature should be free and pure. It should not be controlled by commerce and the market. If literary works were screened, it might destroy the original literary style and core, causing literary works to lose their original charm. In summary, whether literary works should be screened or not needed to be weighed. The screen was beneficial to the spread and development of literature, but at the same time, it would cause a certain degree of damage to literary works. We should respect the freedom and purity of literary works, and at the same time, we should explore and practice literary works on the screen under the premise of protecting literary works.