I bought some handmade doll books in the bookstore. If I make them by hand and sell them online without a trademark or mass production, would it be considered as copyright violation? If he…
It wasn't considered an copyright violation. According to the third paragraph of article 10 of the copyright law of the People's Republic of China, the act of copying, distributing, performing, showing, broadcasting, information network transmission, etc. without the permission of the copyright owner and using the works of others without charging the public is not considered an act of copyright violation. In this case, you make handmade dolls according to the book of handmade dolls and sell them on the Internet without any trademark or mass production, without charging the public a fee, so it's not an copyright violation. Of course, you need to make sure that your handmade doll is the same as the handmade method you learned from the book and does not violate the intellectual property rights or other legal rights of others.
Is uploading a novel that I bought from a bookstore considered an copyright violation?
Whether uploading a novel bought from a bookstore to the Internet was considered an copyright violation depended on whether the act of uploading was related to copyright transfer or copyright authorization in copyright law. The transfer of copyright in copyright law refers to the situation where a copyright owner transfers all or part of the copyright to another copyright owner, and the sender obtains legal control over the copyright while the sender becomes the new copyright owner. If the uploader uploaded his novel to the Internet and obtained the authorization of another copyright owner, the uploading could be regarded as a copyright transfer, and the uploader legally owned the copyright of the novel. On the other hand, if the uploader only uploaded his own novel to the Internet without the authorization of any copyright owner, the uploading behavior may be regarded as copyright violation. This was because the uploader might still have the right to violate the copyright of the novel without the explicit authorization of the copyright owner. Therefore, if the uploader uploaded the novel he bought from the bookstore to the Internet and obtained the authorization of the copyright owner, the uploading could be regarded as a legal transfer of copyright. Otherwise, uploading it could be considered as copyright violation.
If he continued to write some novels by internet gods and did not tell them, would it be considered copyright violation?
If he didn't tell them that he was continuing to write the novel of the Internet God, would it be considered as copyright violation? This depended on whether the act of writing a continuation had anything to do with the author of the original novel. If the act of writing a continuation novel was independent and had no connection to the author of the original novel, then this act would not constitute an copyright violation. However, if the act of writing a continuation of the novel was based on the content of the original novel and was not authorized by the author of the original novel, then this act may constitute copyright violation. In this case, the author of the original novel may sue the author of the continuation novel to protect their intellectual property rights. Therefore, when continuing a novel, one should be careful to ensure that their actions are independent and do not violate the intellectual property rights of the original author. If you want to continue writing a novel by a web god, it's best to contact the god first to obtain their authorization.
Is posting the contents of the book I bought to a blog considered copyright violation?
Such an act could constitute an act of copyright violation. Unauthorized copying, spreading, or posting of the contents of a purchased book to other platforms, including social media such as a blog, may be considered an violation of the author's copyright. Although you can share the story, plot, or character descriptions in the book on your blog, you cannot modify, distort, or steal the original content in the book in any way, nor can you use it for commercial or other illegal purposes. Otherwise, your actions may be considered as copyright violation. If you are not sure whether your actions constitute copyright infringement, you are advised to contact the author or copyright owner of the book and ask for authorization.
I like some of the posts on the internet. I want to make them into a book and publish them in a publishing house. I'll note the original author. Is this considered copyright violation?
The act of adapting an online post into a book was generally a violation of the original author's copyright. This was because copyright protected the author's original expression of the work, not just the thoughts, plot, or characters in the original work. If you only indicate the original author without obtaining the original author's authorization or paying the copyright fee, then it may be considered as copyright violation. In addition, if the adapted work has significant differences from the original author's work or uses elements of the original author's work without authorization, it may also be regarded as copyright violation. Therefore, when adapting an online post into a book, it was recommended to first contact the original author to obtain authorization or pay the copyright fee to avoid possible legal issues.
If the company's name and trademark had the same name, would it be considered as an copyright violation?
If the company's name and trademark were the same and there were no other similarities, then it was usually not considered an copyright violation. This is because according to the provisions of the trademark law, the trademark registration applicants can protect their trademark rights by registering multiple trademark without violating the trademark rights of others because a trademark is the same as another person's trademark. In addition, if there were no other similarities between the company name and the trademark, such as business model, product or service characteristics, it was unlikely to constitute an infringement. However, if the company's name and trademark were similar in other aspects such as pronunciation, font, color, etc., then it might constitute an copyright violation. In this case, it was necessary to analyze the degree of similarity in detail to determine whether it violated the trademark rights of others. Therefore, if the company's name and trademark were the same but there was no similarity in other aspects, then it was usually not considered an copyright violation. However, if there were other similarities, a specific analysis of the situation was needed to determine whether it constituted an infringement.
If I post the novel online, is it considered as copyright violation?
Writing a novel and keeping it locally wouldn't violate copyright because copyright protected the moment of creation, not the moment of transmission after the creation. However, if the novel was uploaded to the Internet, including publishing, sharing, or selling on the website, it might involve copyright issues. This is because copyright protection lasts for 10 years from the date of the first release of the work. Without the permission of the copyright owner, the work cannot be distributed or shared. Therefore, if you want to share or sell a novel on the Internet, it's best to first ask the copyright owner (usually the author or bookstore of the novel) if it's possible to do so. If you share or sell a novel without permission, you may be involved in copyright issues and may lead to legal consequences.
Selling some books that I have already used online, is that considered copyright violation?
If the book has been used, the copyright page and the copyright notice should be marked as used so that the copyright owner can detect the violation. Reselling a used book in such a situation could be regarded as copyright violation. According to copyright law, any act of copying, distributing, displaying, performing, broadcasting, translating, or adapting a copyrited work without authorization is a copyright violation. Therefore, if you sell a book online that has been marked as used by the copyright owner, it is an act of copyright violation. In order to avoid any copyright violation, it is recommended to contact the copyright owner and obtain their permission before selling any books.
I bought a limited edition book online and posted it on an online forum for everyone to browse. Is this considered copyright violation?
There were many factors that needed to be considered to determine whether this was considered as an act of copyright violation, including whether the purchase of the copyright of the book was legal, whether the act of publishing the book violated the author's copyright, whether the content published was authorized by the author, and so on. Under normal circumstances, if the purchase of copyright was legal, then publishing the content would not result in copyright violation. However, if the copyright was sold or distributed to others without authorization, it was an act of violating the author's copyright and could face legal action and compensation. Releasing a limited edition book on the forum had to consider whether it violated the author's copyright and whether the rules of the forum allowed it to be published. Some forums may restrict or censor the content posted. If you violate these rules, you may be deemed to have violated the copyright. If you're not sure if your actions are legal, it's recommended to consult a legal professional first to avoid unnecessary risks.
Is there copyright in online novels? If I imitate a plot in a web novel, would it be considered as copyright violation?
Online novels usually had copyrights because copyright protection began in the late 19th century. Therefore, online novel authors and editors needed to protect their copyrights to prevent others from copying, adapting, or distributing their works without permission. If you wanted to imitate a plot in a web novel, you had to consider whether it was a copyright violation. Generally speaking, if the behavior did not violate copyright, it would not be considered as an copyright violation. However, if they violated copyright, they might face legal action and compensation. In order to avoid copyright violation, it is recommended to obtain the permission of the copyright owner before imitating the plot of the online novel. If you are not sure if you have violated copyright, please consult a professional lawyer.
Was it considered copyright violation to copy the article from the book and sell it?
Excerpting an article from a book to sell the book would be considered an act of copyright violation, depending on whether the copyright of the book had been authorized or not. If the copyright of the book has not been authorized by the owner, copying the article and using it for commercial purposes may be regarded as copyright violation. In this case, the author may own the copyright of the work and have the right to prevent anyone from using his work without authorization. If the content in the article is original and without the author's permission, then the use of the content may not be regarded as copyright violation. However, it is important to note that even authorized use may be regarded as copyright violation. If the copyright owner of the book has authorized the translation, adaptation, deduction, etc. of the book, then copying the content of the article and using it for commercial purposes will not be considered as copyright violation as long as it does not exceed the scope of the authorization. If the copyright of the book has been granted, then using the content of the article may not be considered as copyright violation. However, using the content of the article for commercial use without authorization may be regarded as copyright violation and may be subject to legal penalties. Therefore, if you intend to use the extracted article for commercial use, it is best to confirm whether the copyright of the book has been authorized by the owner to avoid possible legal risks.