The Spring and Autumn Annals of the Ten Kingdoms, Wu Renchen," It is based on the history of hegemony, miscellaneous history, and the words of novelists. It is based on the official history." Is it biased towards this novel, not history?
In the Spring and Autumn Annals of the Ten Kingdoms, Wu Renchen had said that he had used various historical documents, overlord history, miscellaneous history, and the words of novelists to prove the authenticity of these documents. Thus, from this perspective, the Ten Kingdoms Spring and Autumn Annals was indeed a work that combined many elements of history, literature, and novels, and not a pure history book.
Is a novel based on official history considered official history?
Usually, the author who adapted the official history into a novel was a man-made author. Therefore, whether the novel was called "official history" depended on the reader's evaluation and recognition of the novel. Some people may think that the novel is similar to official history and call it "official history", while others think that the novel is different from official history or does not conform to historical facts, so they call it "unofficial history". However, in some cases, the author may deliberately ignore certain details or plots or reinterpret or arrange historical events, thus causing readers to doubt the authenticity of the novel. In this case, the author needs to clearly explain the authenticity and accuracy of the novel to the reader or it will be regarded as a fictional novel. Therefore, it was up to the reader's opinion and judgment whether or not to regard the adaptation of official history into a novel as "official history".
Ancient Chinese history was divided into official history, non-official history, miscellaneous history and unofficial history. How to view it?
There were indeed different versions and classifications of ancient Chinese history, such as official history, alternative history, miscellaneous history, and unofficial history. Official history books were written by the government, recording the views of the government and the decisions of the imperial court, which were important references for historical research. Bie shi was written by private history books, recording the views and opinions of different sects and interest groups, which were often political. Unofficial history, on the other hand, was a history book that had no official records and was privately written. The content of the book was often more realistic, but it was also limited by historical conditions, making it difficult to draw a comprehensive and accurate conclusion. From an academic point of view, official history, alternative history, miscellaneous history, and unofficial history are all important materials for historical research, but their value and accuracy will be evaluated according to different research methods and standards. In historical research, official history, as an official work, has high historical and cultural value, but it also needs to be comprehensively analyzed and compared with other materials to draw a comprehensive and accurate conclusion. Unofficial history, as a history book without official records, might be more authentic, but it also needed to be treated with caution to avoid being influenced by subjective assumptions. In short, official history, alternative history, miscellaneous history and unofficial history were all important components of ancient Chinese history. They were of great significance to the understanding and study of ancient Chinese history. In the study of history, we need to use a variety of materials such as official history, alternative history, miscellaneous history, and unofficial history to analyze and compare them in order to draw a comprehensive and accurate conclusion.
Ancient Chinese history was mostly based on "official history", so was unofficial history unreliable?
Ancient Chinese history was indeed mostly based on "official history". These official histories were written and recorded by the government and usually had high authority and credibility. However, unofficial history did exist. It was written by folk people or different interested parties. There might be some inaccuracy or missing situations. Unofficial history may be more realistic and closer to historical facts than official history, but there may also be some subjective and prejudice. Because official history and unofficial history often came from different classes and groups, with different writing purposes and interest tendencies, the gap between the two could be relatively large. When we read history, we need to make a comprehensive analysis and judgment of official history and unofficial history to obtain more comprehensive and accurate historical information. At the same time, we also need to maintain an objective and fair attitude towards history to avoid blind superstition or excessive criticism.
'Records of the Kingdoms of the Eastern Zhou Dynasty' is a novel. Is its content based on official history? Or was it an unofficial history?
The Records of the Kingdoms of the Eastern Zhou Dynasty was not a novel but a historical work in ancient China. The Records of the Eastern Zhou Dynasty was a comprehensive historical work that mainly recorded the history and figures of the Eastern Zhou Dynasty during the Spring and Autumn Period (770 - 476 B.C.). It was said that the author of the book was a Song Dynasty man who mainly referred to the literature and folklore of the time and combined his own knowledge and thoughts. The contents of the Records of the Eastern Zhou Dynasty were recognized by official history books such as Records of the Historian and Zi Zhi Tong Jian. The book was also regarded as a treasure in ancient Chinese historical works, and it was of great value to the study of ancient Chinese history and culture. However, it should be noted that the authenticity and accuracy of historical documents have always been controversial. Therefore, the contents of the "Records of the Eastern Zhou Dynasty" may also have some fictional and legendary elements that should not be regarded as completely true historical records.
Is "Secrets of the Three Kingdoms" based on official history or "Romance of the Three Kingdoms"
Secrets of the Three Kingdoms was a novel set in the Three Kingdoms period, based on Romance of the Three Kingdoms. Romance of the Three Kingdoms was a famous historical novel in ancient China. It described the historical stories and characters of the Three Kingdoms period. Secrets of the Three Kingdoms presented a more realistic and complex world of the Three Kingdoms through the description of politics, military affairs, and characters during the Three Kingdoms period. Although there were some differences between the Secret of the Three Kingdoms and Romance of the Three Kingdoms, it was still based on Romance of the Three Kingdoms.
The ranking of the top ten strategists in the official history of the Three Kingdoms must be based on evidence.
The Three Kingdoms period was a very important period in Chinese history, during which many outstanding figures emerged. During this period, many strategists had made great contributions to the country, so the top ten strategists of the Three Kingdoms period were also closely watched. The following was the top ten strategists in the official history of the Three Kingdoms period: 1 Zhuge Liang: He was one of the most famous strategists during the Three Kingdoms period and was known as "Mr. Wolong". He put forward many suggestions for governing the country and made great contributions to the development and stability of Shu Han. 2 Xun You: He was one of the most famous strategists in Wei and was known as the "Ancestor of Xun Yu". He made many important strategic suggestions and made great contributions to the political and military development of Wei. 3. Guo Jia: He was one of the advisors of Wei State and was known as "Guo Fengxiao". He made many important strategic suggestions and made great contributions to the political and military development of Wei. 4. Jia Xu: He was one of the famous strategists at the end of the Han Dynasty and was known as the "Poison Warrior". He made many important strategies and suggestions for the country and made great contributions to the political and military development of the Han Dynasty. 5. Pang Tong: He was one of the strategists of the State of Wu during the Three Kingdoms period and was known as the "Young Phoenix". He made many important strategic suggestions and made great contributions to the political and military development of the State of Wu. 6 Sima Yi: He was one of the strategists of the Wei Kingdom and was known as Sima Zhao. He made many important strategic suggestions and made great contributions to the political and military development of Wei. 7 Zhou Yu: He was one of the strategists of the State of Wu during the Three Kingdoms period and was known as "Zhou Lang." He made many important strategic suggestions and made great contributions to the political and military development of the State of Wu. 8. Lu Su: He was one of the strategists of the State of Wu during the Three Kingdoms period and was known as the "Duke of Lu". He made many important strategic suggestions and made great contributions to the political and military development of the State of Wu. Xun You: He was one of the most famous strategists in Wei and was known as the "Ancestor of Xun Yu". He made many important strategic suggestions and made great contributions to the political and military development of Wei. 10 Guan Yu: He was one of the generals of the Shu Han during the Three Kingdoms period and was known as "Guan Yunchang". He put forward many important strategies and suggestions, which made great contributions to the development and stability of Shu Han.
Is the secret history of Yongzheng a novel or an official history?
The Secret History of Yongzheng is a novel and not an official history. Yongzheng was an emperor of the Qing Dynasty, and his secret history was written into a novel about how he won the political struggle and established his own dynasty. Although this novel had a certain historical background and fictional elements, it was not an official history but a literary work.
Are there any Chinese historical novels that are biased towards official history that I can recommend?
😋I can recommend the following novels about Chinese history to you. These novels are more inclined to the plot of official history: 1. Zhenguan Great Idler 2. Qin Conquest the World 3. Legend of the Western Han Dynasty Ranger 4. New Southern Song Dynasty 5. Sui Blood 6. " Two Thousand Years in Phantom Valley " 7. From Tribe to Empire 8. Biography of the First Emperor 9. " Starting from Yiling covering Liu Bei's retreat." I hope you like my recommendation.😗
What are the excellent commentaries based on official history?
An excellent storyteller based on official history referred to a storyteller that told a story in a historical context. The difference between online novels and storytellers was that storytellers usually used historical events as a blueprint to tell the story. The following are some excellent commentaries based on official history: 1. A series of works such as "Yu Shi Ming Yan","Jing Shi Tong Yan" and "Xing Shi Heng Yan" in "San Yan". These works, with the Tang and Song dynasties as the background, told many philosophical and interesting stories, which were regarded as the classics in the history of Chinese storytelling. 2. The storytelling in 'Dream of the Red Chamber' was usually called 'The Audible Version of Dream of the Red Chamber'. It used the stories of Jia Baoyu, Lin Daiyu and others as the main line to describe the rise and fall of a feudal dynasty. It was a classic work in ancient Chinese novels. The storytelling in Romance of the Three Kingdoms was often called the " audio version of Romance of the Three Kingdoms ". It was a classic of ancient Chinese novels, which narrated the historical events and characters of the Three Kingdoms period. The storytelling in Water Margins was often called the audio version of Water Margins. It was one of the most important works in the history of Chinese storytelling. It was based on the story of the Water Margins at the end of the Song Dynasty. These works were all classics of ancient Chinese novels, with profound historical and cultural implications and artistic value, and were widely sung and listened to.
Is the Romance of Ancient Chinese History an official history or a novel?
The Romance of Ancient Chinese History was a novel and not a history book. The novel is a fictional art form that tells stories through exaggeration, imagination, and fictional plots. Although novels may involve historical events and characters, they are usually a re-description or adaptation of historical events and characters, adding the author's own imagination and views. Therefore, there was a big difference between novels and official history.