This was a tricky problem that needed to be analyzed in the context of the overall plot and character of the novel, The Necklace. However, from the perspective of ordinary novel writing, saying that the necklace was fake at the end of the novel could have a reverse effect and leave a deep impression on the readers. At the same time, it could also strengthen the plot and theme of the novel. In particular, if the plot at the beginning of the novel had made the reader believe that the necklace was real, then the sudden turn at the end of the novel that the necklace was fake would give the reader an unexpected feeling and deepen the understanding of the plot and character of the novel. In addition, this turning point can also strengthen the theme of the novel, such as revealing that the necklace is fake and criticizing the vanity and falsehood in society, so that the readers can think more deeply about this problem. The plot of The Necklace was very complicated, and it required a combination of specific situations and plot analysis to answer. However, if you want to know the effect of the necklace being fake at the end of the novel, you can read the novel a few more times and think about the plot and the character's personality so that you can better understand the problem.
necklace Maupassant In a small village in Paris lived a young girl named Mathilde. She was a very smart, beautiful and rich girl with a priceless necklace. The necklace was bought for her father, but when he died, she had to return it to her father's friend, a merchant named Nicolas de Borg. Nicholas de Burgue was a wealthy businessman whose wealth could not afford the cost of Mathilde's necklace. So he decided to kidnap Mathilde and try to extort her to pay more. Mathilde didn't know that the necklace had been kidnapped by Nicholas de Bourgue. She thought the necklace was at her house, but when she went to school, she found it missing. She was very worried because she knew that the necklace was worth a fortune and she didn't know if Nicholas de Bourgue would find it. Hence, she decided to call the police. The police soon arrived at the scene and asked Mathilde anything about the necklace. But Mathilde didn't know how to answer the policeman's question because she didn't know if the necklace had been found by Nicolas de Bourgue. In the end, the police decided to ask Mathilde to provide some clues to help them find the necklace. So Mathilde provided the police with a piece of the necklace and told them that it was part of the necklace. This necklace fragment is very precious because it contains some of the core components of the necklace.
The ending of the novel could summarize, summarize, and look forward to the plot. It could highlight the theme, strengthen the emotions, and trigger the readers to think. If the necklace in the novel was fake, such an ending could have the following effects: 1. Prominent theme: Through the plot that the necklace is fake, the novel can emphasize the conflict and opposition between "wealth" and "love" and reveal the problems of greed and vanity in human nature, so as to better highlight the theme of the novel. (2) Strengthening emotions: If the necklace of the novel is fake, the emotional impact left in the reader's heart will be even greater. The readers might cherish the characters and plots in the novel more and feel the emotions in the novel more deeply. 3. Make the reader think: The plot of the novel's necklace being fake can make the reader think about wealth and love, vanity and true value. The readers could get some inspiration and insights from it, which would help them deepen their understanding of the novel's theme. 4. Endless aftertaste: The plot of the novel's necklace being fake can make the reader ponder the details and deep meaning of the story. This kind of endless aftertaste could allow the reader to understand the theme and emotions of the novel more deeply, which would help improve the reader's reading experience.
" Necklace " was a French story about a poor woman named Mathilde. In order to repay her debt, she used her necklace as collateral to borrow money from the bank. Later, because of a misunderstanding, the necklace was mistaken as a stolen item and was lost. Mathilde fell into poverty as a result. At the end of the novel, after Mathilde escaped from prison, she returned home to find that her home was decorated with a shiny necklace hanging on the wall. She realized that this necklace was an important symbol of family, representing the warmth and wealth of the family. Therefore, the necklace had the meaning of home in the novel, representing the family and wealth in Mathilde's heart, and also symbolizing her hope of regaining freedom and dignity. The necklace was the meaning of home. After Mathilde escaped from prison, he returned home and found a shiny necklace hanging on the wall. This necklace represented the warmth and wealth of her family, as well as her hope of regaining freedom and dignity. It was a symbol of her new life.
The ending of the novel," The Necklace," said that the necklace was fake, which caused the readers to have doubts about the story and cause them to think. This conclusion implied that the necklace was not as real as they had imagined, but an illusion. The existence of this illusion made the characters and events in the story no longer simple facts, but could be understood and explained. This conclusion also caused the readers to think about the values conveyed by the story. In the novel, the necklace represented a kind of promise and treasure of love. If the necklace was real, then this kind of promise and treasure would no longer exist. This conclusion also implies that love, like other values, can be fabricated and exaggerated, but this does not mean that they are not true. Therefore, the ending of the novel,"The Necklace", said that the necklace was fake, which made the story more profound and meaningful by triggering the readers 'thoughts and questions.
The sub-titles of the full text of The Necklace by Maurpassant were as follows: The first part: - The Story of the Necklace - The origin of the necklace - The protagonist of the necklace - a price for one The second part: - The Necklace's Encounter - The loss of the necklace - The value of the necklace - The repayment of the necklace The third part: - The unexpected discovery of the necklace - The truth about the necklace - The Necklace's Impact - The End of the Necklace The above is the full text of the "Necklace" section of the sub-title.
The "necklace is fake" in the French ending of "The Necklace" has profound meaning and symbolic meaning. This plot expressed his deep thoughts on human nature and his criticism of the real society. In his eyes, people were often attracted by superficial vanity and material wealth and ignored their true value and meaning. Although the necklace was beautiful on the surface, it could not hide its emptiness and hypocrisy. Therefore, the fact that the necklace was fake reminded people to pay attention to the inner value and meaning, not just to pursue external material enjoyment. This plot also reflected the criticism of French society by Mauricio. In his novels, poverty and injustice often appeared. People were often dominated by material wealth and power, losing themselves and their souls. Therefore, the plot of "the necklace is fake" also hinted at the dark side of society and the distortion of human nature, reminding people to stay sober and rational and not be confused by material wealth. The last part of the story," The necklace is fake," also had a symbolic meaning. As a symbol of traditional culture, necklaces represented the status and honor of women. In his novels, women were often bound by material wealth and social status, unable to pursue self-awareness and freedom. Therefore, the plot of "the necklace is fake" also expressed the desire of women to pursue freedom and independence, as well as the reflection and criticism of traditional culture. To sum up, the "necklace is fake" at the end of "The Necklace" expressed the deep thinking of human nature and the criticism of the real society. At the same time, it also reflected the desire of women to pursue freedom and independence, which had profound meaning and symbolic significance.
The necklace in the French ending was fake, which could be understood as a reversal or an explanation for the ending of the story. From the beginning of the story, the protagonist Mathilde believed that this necklace was naturally priceless. However, when she found a fake diamond on the necklace, she began to doubt the true value of the necklace. She began to wonder if her values and beliefs were influenced by material things. The necklace at the end was fake, which could be understood as the real diamond was not the real value. Mathilde lost himself in the pursuit of material wealth. At the same time, the existence of this fake diamond also made her realize that wealth was not the only standard to measure value. True value came from the pursuit and belief in her heart. This ending could also be understood as Mathilde's redemption. She finally understood that true value came from inner pursuits and beliefs, not material wealth. Although the necklace was fake, it gave Mathilde some inspiration and helped her find her own direction.
The full text of 'The Necklace' was as follows: Matilde da Vinci was a wealthy French nobleman who owned a priceless necklace--a long necklace made of 18K gold inlaid with sparkling gems. She had bought this necklace from a jeweler before she married a famous painter. The protagonist of the story was a painter named Nicholas Lefevor. He found Mathilde's necklace by chance and was attracted to it. He decided to pursue Mathilde and painted her a famous oil painting, The Necklace. However, Mathilde did not like her painter boyfriend. She preferred another painter, Bernardo de Forge (Bernardo de Forge de Mobassant). She gave the necklace to Bernardo and told him that she was willing to marry him, but only if he gave up pursuing Nicholas. Nicholas was deeply disappointed after learning the truth, but he still insisted on pursuing Mathilde. In the end, Mathilde chose to marry Bernardo and live a happy life. This novel is considered one of the representative works of maupassant. It reflects the social class division and the change of moral values in French society through the life experience of a rich aristocrat. It was also considered a classic novel about love, marriage, and human nature.
The Necklace was published in France in 1884. The following is the full text of the novel: I spent the afternoon at Mathilde's house. She's a distant relative of mine who's been living here for some time, but I've always been amazed by her beauty and intelligence. She had a priceless necklace that she had bought from a jeweler in the middle of nowhere. The jeweler told her that the necklace was a natural diamond, but after artificial processing, its value could be multiplied several times. Mathilde was afraid that the necklace would be lost or stolen, so she locked it in the safe and checked it every day. One night, her friend, a young rich girl, came to visit her. She saw Mathilde's necklace and wanted to take it away. Mathilde tried to stop her, but she eventually stole the necklace. The next morning, Mathilde found that the necklace was missing. She began to worry that the necklace would be thought to be stolen, so she called the police. The police investigated and found that the necklace had been stolen by the young girl's mother and sold to a jeweler. Mathilde was desperate. She realized that her necklace had been stolen, but she also realized that she could learn more knowledge and become smarter through this incident. She decided not to rely on the necklace to prove her value and status, but to start building her own life. This story tells a story about wealth and status, but also reveals the weaknesses and desires of human beings.
The Necklace was published in France in 1884. The following is the full text of the novel: On a spring morning, Mathieu remarque, a young Paris girl, chose a priceless necklace in a jewelry store. The necklace was a white gemstone made of a rare gemstone with a red and blue gemstone inlaid on it. Mathilde realized that owning the necklace would improve her social status, so she decided to give it to her best friend as a birthday present, hoping that the friendship would last until she got married. Mathilde's friend was called Emile de Rigueur, a wealthy noble who owned a jewelry shop. When Mathilde gave the necklace to Emile, he was very happy and immediately gave it to his wife. However, Emile's wife did not appreciate the necklace, thinking it was too expensive and did not suit her style. She put the necklace in the drawer and decided to sell it to pay for the expensive jewelry. The friendship between Mathilde and Emile grew closer and closer. However, they both knew about the necklace, which made their relationship awkward. Mathilde felt uncomfortable because she knew that the necklace had negatively affected her relationship with Emile. In the end, Mathilde decided to confess to Emil about the necklace and asked him to reconsider their friendship. Emile's wife also confessed to Mathilde about the necklace and told her the truth. Mathilde and Emile finally realized that their friendship was built on mutual respect and honesty, and that the necklace was only an obstacle to their friendship. They re-established contact and decided to continue to cherish their friendship.