The introduction could be modified before the new book was submitted for review. The purpose of modifying the introduction was to make the work easier for readers to understand and attract their interest. If the introduction was not attractive enough or clear enough, it might affect the review results of the work. Therefore, it is recommended to modify the introduction before submitting it for review to make it more attractive and accurately express the theme and style of the work.
After the new book was submitted, the introduction could be modified, but it could only be modified after the review staff had approved it. Changing the introduction may result in the review being rejected. Therefore, it is recommended to consider carefully before submitting the changes to ensure that the content of the introduction conforms to the platform's regulations.
Unfortunately, the title of the book had been changed. However, there was no need to worry. What was important was the content! If you like fantasy romance novels, I can recommend " The Demon Lord's Wife Courting " to you. If you are interested in urban superpowers, you can try " Immortal Cultivation: Ascending to Earth ". If you like light novels derived from doujinshi stories, you can read " Elves: Becoming a Master Begins from Traveling Everywhere ". If you want to read some youthful and pure love novels, you might as well try " Alien " or " Hand in Hand, Love ". I hope you can find a story you like. If you need more recommendations, feel free to tell me!
If he wanted to write another book, he had to pass. The review time depended on many factors such as the type of book, content, style, and so on. Under normal circumstances, the review time would be between a few hours and a few days. You can set the chapter title, body, picture, and other content on the "publish chapter" page and then choose "submit". The reviewers would check if the content of the book met the requirements and submit it to the publishing department for review after confirmation. It should be noted that the time may be affected by factors such as network conditions. Therefore, it is recommended to check whether the content of the book meets the requirements and ensure that the network connection is stable before submitting it for review.
This meant that the novel had passed the online literature platform's review and was qualified to be published on the platform. However, whether or not someone could sign a contract with the novel did not only depend on whether the novel passed the review, but also on the quality, theme, style, and so on. If the quality of the novel was high, the theme was popular, and the style met the platform's requirements, many people might pay attention to it and want to sign a contract. In addition, he also needed to pay attention to the platform's developments to see if other authors or editors were working with the platform and if the platform would sign contracts and recommend novels. Therefore, if the novel was published and passed the review, they still had to continue to work hard to improve the quality and appeal of the novel and actively participate in the platform's activities and community. Only in this way could they gain more attention and influence, and then sign the contract and publish it.
In Xiaoxiang Academy, if a new book did not pass the review, it could be edited on the editing page after the chapter was published. The specific editing page address and operation steps may vary according to different platforms. It is recommended to go to the official website of Xiaoxiang Academy or the relevant community forums to check and consult. On the editing page, one needed to log into the Xiaoxiang Academy account and select the corresponding chapter to modify. Modifications needed to be filled in according to the platform's requirements, including changing the title of the book, chapter title, content modification, etc. If the modified content met the requirements of the platform, the system would prompt that the modification was successful and display the modified page. However, if the modified content did not meet the requirements of the platform, the system might prompt that it could not be modified or request a new book to be published. If the new book did not pass the review and the chapter was changed, it did not meet the requirements to be removed from the review. It is recommended to first apply for a review objection and wait for the platform's reviewers to review or re-publish the new book.
But would he delete the book if he kept the manuscript and did not update it? Under normal circumstances, if the author did not update for a long time or did not publish a new chapter, the work would be automatically deleted due to reasons such as "low activity" or "poor quality of the work". However, if the author wanted to update the work, it was best to communicate with the assistant in time to let the assistant know about the new update plan to ensure the quality of the work.
Therefore, whether the manuscript would be deleted depended on the specific situation. If the manuscript was not updated, the publishing house or website might delete the manuscript because there was not enough content to attract readers. However, this did not mean that… It could help and receive editor's suggestions and guidance as well as help to establish connections with websites. If there were enough updates, the manuscript might be re-adopted. Therefore, he actively interacted with editors and websites to attract readers 'attention and increase the exposure of his works.
However, it was up to the platform to decide whether the book would be deleted or not. It allows and accepts feedback and comments from readers. If a novel had passed the review but had not been updated, the platform might consider deleting the novel. This was because it was difficult for a reader to discover new content and plot, and it was also difficult to maintain the reader's interest. In addition, if a post didn't attract enough attention, the platform might think that it had lost its appeal and consider deleting it. But it does allow for the interest of the readers to be maintained. If they were willing and actively engaged with readers, the platform might tolerate their works and provide more support.
Some platforms might have a limit on the number of words to ensure the quality of the article. In addition, if the number of words was not enough, it might be regarded as insufficient quality and cause the review to fail. In the process of writing, you need to pay attention to the structure and logic of the article, as well as the expression and fluency of the language. All of these may lead to the review process of the article being considered by the reviewers to be of insufficient quality and need further improvement. If you have submitted your article but still haven't passed the review, it is recommended to carefully check the article to ensure that it meets the requirements of the platform and try to improve the quality of the article. You can look for other ways to improve the quality of the article.
Generally speaking, the reviewers would judge whether the work met the requirements of the platform based on the actual situation. If the quality of the work met the platform's standards, it might be approved and enter the publishing process. However, the review process might take a long time. Therefore, it is recommended to pay more attention to the content of the work while waiting for the review process and make timely changes to ensure that it meets the requirements of the platform.