The name in the novel was the same as the name in reality. Could it be said that it violated the right to reputation?

2024-09-04 08:21

1 answer

2024-09-04 10:18

Generally speaking, the same name in the novel as the real name would not violate the right of reputation. This is because the works in the novel are fictional and are not restricted by the laws of the real world, so the names in the novel can also be fictional. However, if the name in the novel is the same or similar to a person in the real world, if this person has damage to his reputation in reality, then the novel may be considered to have violated this person's reputation. This is because using the same or similar name in the novel may cause the person's name to be confused or misunderstood, resulting in damage to his or her reputation. Therefore, if the name in the novel is the same or similar to the person in reality and this person has damage to the reputation in reality, then the novel may be considered to have violated this person's reputation.

Is the name of the shop casually given in the novel and the name of the shop in reality an violation of the right?

1 answer

2024-09-04 07:52

The random name of the shop in the novel and the name of the shop in reality did not necessarily constitute an violation of rights. Whether it was a violation of rights or not depended on the relevant legal provisions and the actual situation. In some countries or regions, the law stipulated that the naming of a store should follow certain rules, such as not copying other people's works, not violating other people's intellectual property rights, etc. If the random name of the shop in the novel and the name of the shop in real life were in accordance with the law in these aspects, then the duplicate name did not necessarily constitute a violation of the law. However, in reality, many shops would often come up with a unique name to attract customers based on their own business characteristics, regional characteristics, and other reasons. If these store names violated the intellectual property rights of others or violated the law, then it might constitute an copyright violation. Therefore, it is recommended to understand the relevant laws and regulations in advance to avoid unnecessary disputes when choosing the name of the shop in the novel or using other people's shop names in reality.

Is it considered a violation of the right to name when the villain in the novel has the same name as himself?

1 answer

2024-09-09 16:38

The same name as the villain in the novel did not necessarily constitute a violation of the right to name. The right to use one's name referred to the right of an individual to use his or her own name, including the right to use it publicly in the law and the right to use the name of others without being prohibited. If the villain in the novel had the same name as himself, but the use of the name of the character did not violate the name of others, for example, the name of the character was used as the name of the character instead of the real name, then it would not be considered an violation of the right to name. However, if the villain in the novel had the same name as himself and appeared in the novel or in real life, such as someone using the same name or a similar name to deceive or confuse the public, then this might violate the name of others. In this case, the author or editor of the novel may need to change the names of the characters to avoid causing trouble to others. The same name as the villain in the novel did not necessarily constitute an violation of the right to name. The specific situation needed to be analyzed.